Lightroom CC: Ability to add watermarks to images

  • 183
  • Idea
  • Updated 5 hours ago
  • (Edited)
I see nowhere to add watermarks to my photo's ...
Photo of Benny Thaibert

Benny Thaibert

  • 4 Posts
  • 2 Reply Likes

Posted 4 months ago

  • 183
Photo of Victoria Bampton - Lightroom Queen

Victoria Bampton - Lightroom Queen, Champion

  • 3580 Posts
  • 1125 Reply Likes
That feature's not in 1.0, but I'll convert this to a feature request. 
Photo of Corbin Davenport

Corbin Davenport

  • 1 Post
  • 13 Reply Likes
I would also really want to see watermark support in the new Lightroom. I like the new design, but the lack of exporting with watermarks is the main reason I can't switch.
(Edited)
Photo of Steve Harris

Steve Harris

  • 8 Posts
  • 1 Reply Like
Please please please please please please please please please please watermarking images on sync to LR CC.
Photo of Susan Roberts Hayes

Susan Roberts Hayes

  • 1 Post
  • 2 Reply Likes
Yep, without the watermarking feature, it's no good to me.
Photo of Kim Jaloustre

Kim Jaloustre

  • 1 Post
  • 0 Reply Likes
Already written but yeah I need the watermark option, its really lacking on that new version!
Photo of Shawn Basey

Shawn Basey

  • 1 Post
  • 0 Reply Likes
Yeah, I really like the workflow in the new CC, but no watermark means I can't use it.
Photo of Melody On

Melody On

  • 1 Post
  • 0 Reply Likes
Yes, I would love the watermarking feature as well please!
Photo of Cindy Yale

Cindy Yale

  • 1 Post
  • 5 Reply Likes
Please add the watermark to CC....quickly!  I updated before knowing this.  
Photo of Damian Charles

Damian Charles

  • 1 Post
  • 8 Reply Likes
Just spent a whole hour editing in the new CC only to find out I have to use the older version to watermark. How did they miss the mark on that?
Photo of Miguel Colleoni

Miguel Colleoni

  • 4 Posts
  • 6 Reply Likes
We can't work with the Lightroom CC without watermarks. We really need this! Please Adobe consider this a very important feature.
Photo of Jose Carlos Gz

Jose Carlos Gz

  • 3 Posts
  • 2 Reply Likes
AGREE!
Photo of Lucian Daniliuc

Lucian Daniliuc

  • 1 Post
  • 0 Reply Likes
Agreed. Now I need to use other software just to add the watermark. 
Photo of Hiu Cho Wong

Hiu Cho Wong

  • 1 Post
  • 3 Reply Likes
This reply was created from a merged topic originally titled watermarking for shared album.

We will definitely need a watermarking tool for all photo before sharing our photo online for our client, like for selection.
Photo of Ana Vides

Ana Vides

  • 1 Post
  • 1 Reply Like
Tell me if I am right, there is no way of adding a water mark on the DESKTOP nor the mobile version. Is this correct?
Photo of Luis Arabia

Luis Arabia

  • 6 Posts
  • 0 Reply Likes
Yes , this is true!
Photo of Joep Deumes

Joep Deumes

  • 1 Post
  • 0 Reply Likes
it is one the most important items, so for now I can't change
Photo of Gisela Merkuur

Gisela Merkuur

  • 4 Posts
  • 2 Reply Likes
Also for us a very important feature, we cannot change to CC unless this is taken care of, so...PLEASE ADOBE....FIX THIS!!
Photo of Christina Juarez

Christina Juarez

  • 1 Post
  • 0 Reply Likes
I agree, very important feature. 
Photo of richard koek

richard koek

  • 5 Posts
  • 4 Reply Likes
As a professional I sometimes limit the amount of FINAL IMAGES that may be used. Watermarking is ESSENTIAL in order to protect the download or plain screen-wrapping of images. It is essential to safe guard the quality of my end product. Unedited images may be used as final product. I have had numerous times actors and even celebrities using unmarked images on their professional promotional platforms. Seeing it appearing in news outlets or even on IMBD! Without watermarking images lead their own life. Down the line the graphic designer or assistant will not ask :"DO WE HAVE THE USAGE RIGHTS?". Not watermarking hurts my business and is extremely frustrating. ADD THIS FEATURE TO CC. otherwise this program is useless for me. Great for amateurs not for professionals. Intagram:richardkoek
(Edited)
Photo of Shunsuke Samuel Sumitani

Shunsuke Samuel Sumitani

  • 4 Posts
  • 0 Reply Likes
Even as an amateur, Lightroom CC is pretty useless to me at the moment.
Photo of John Hansen

John Hansen

  • 31 Posts
  • 7 Reply Likes
I actually think this was Adobe's intention. They may have determined that their next big market for market growth were the "true" amateurs and Adobe then targeted that specific market segment. After they released Lightroom CC, the professionals created so much noise that they had to produce LR Classic CC and when they did that, it was a halfhearted sloppy product due to the rush to do public relations damage control.
Photo of Victoria Bampton - Lightroom Queen

Victoria Bampton - Lightroom Queen, Champion

  • 3577 Posts
  • 1123 Reply Likes
Er, interesting theory, but they were released on the same day John.
Photo of John Hansen

John Hansen

  • 31 Posts
  • 7 Reply Likes
Victoria, As you know, perception is reality. And when they released it, what I saw first was Lightroom CC, and I did not become aware of Lightroom Classic CC until later. In fact I did not feel Lightroom CC was of interest to me. I guess I should retract my theory so as not to mislead anyone. What I remember most is how hard it was to understand what Adobe was doing.
Photo of Victoria Bampton - Lightroom Queen

Victoria Bampton - Lightroom Queen, Champion

  • 3577 Posts
  • 1123 Reply Likes
Yes, their communication left a lot to be desired.
Photo of Kathy Johnson

Kathy Johnson

  • 2 Posts
  • 2 Reply Likes
So it's not just me!  No watermark feature makes the program useless for me as well. Now I have to find a program to do that with - yet another expense.  I detest the new Lightroom, enough so that I will stop using the programs altogether.  They took a good product and trashed it. 
Photo of Kim Rickards

Kim Rickards

  • 1 Post
  • 2 Reply Likes
Please add this feature back! We need the ability to watermark photos without having to go through a third party software or run everything through a batch program in PS. 
Photo of Olesya Vulakh

Olesya Vulakh

  • 2 Posts
  • 2 Reply Likes
It is a money making system. 
Lightroom CC- is brilliant and easy program to use, you pay $10 per month, but to put watermark - you have to use Lightroom Classic, or Photoshop - and it's another fees per month!
(Edited)
Photo of Gisela Merkuur

Gisela Merkuur

  • 4 Posts
  • 2 Reply Likes
IT is indeed rediculous...a great deal of the Ushers are professional photographers and for us it is one of the most important features to add watermarks to protect out work!!!!!!!
Photo of Gisela Merkuur

Gisela Merkuur

  • 4 Posts
  • 2 Reply Likes
This is the main reason not to but it.....
Photo of Gisela Merkuur

Gisela Merkuur

  • 4 Posts
  • 2 Reply Likes
Buy
Photo of Luis Arabia

Luis Arabia

  • 6 Posts
  • 0 Reply Likes
This reply was created from a merged topic originally titled Marca de agua o logo en Lightroom CC.

Sería muy bueno si se pudiese agregar también al Lightroom CC  la marca de agua o logo a las fotografías
Photo of Alessandro Castagnini

Alessandro Castagnini

  • 11 Posts
  • 1 Reply Like
Does watermark makes your pictures better? :D
Photo of Luis Arabia

Luis Arabia

  • 6 Posts
  • 0 Reply Likes
Not at all, but should be more secured for copyright, don’t you believe? Is up to you!!!
Photo of Alessandro Castagnini

Alessandro Castagnini

  • 11 Posts
  • 1 Reply Like
Not at all... as soon as you put a pic on the web, it’s easy to copy and remove any watermark.
The only thing you can use to prove it’s your is to own the RAW file :)
Photo of Luis Arabia

Luis Arabia

  • 6 Posts
  • 0 Reply Likes
Agree, but it is not so easy when you put many watermarks. Anyway, always when I put and image on web it is in the lower resolution . Tks
Photo of Miguel Colleoni

Miguel Colleoni

  • 4 Posts
  • 5 Reply Likes
Not just for copyrights, but people may want to know who is the photographer. Besides, it's your brand.
Photo of Anthony Moore

Anthony Moore

  • 1 Post
  • 0 Reply Likes
This reply was created from a merged topic originally titled Does Lightroom CC not allow watermark editing?.
Photo of Greg Walker

Greg Walker

  • 1 Post
  • 2 Reply Likes
It's frustrating to have to switch between Lightroom CC and Photoshop just to add a watermark. Hopefully they add it into the new CC as well as a batch watermark feature...
Photo of Bevan Newlands

Bevan Newlands

  • 1 Post
  • 1 Reply Like
Please add watermark to lightroom CC. It is useless without it.
(Edited)
Photo of Rohan Van Der Have

Rohan Van Der Have

  • 2 Posts
  • 1 Reply Like
The watermark feature is essential, for all our benefit please listen to your users
Photo of Scott Prentice

Scott Prentice

  • 5 Posts
  • 0 Reply Likes
I'm totally voting YES, ADD THE WATERMARK FEATURE...
Photo of Jose Carlos Gz

Jose Carlos Gz

  • 3 Posts
  • 2 Reply Likes
Really need to add watermarks on this version. I spent a whole week editing like 500 photos, in the end - no watermark feature! There is no way I can convey in a message how I feel ... :(
Photo of Stephanie Loomis

Stephanie Loomis

  • 1 Post
  • 0 Reply Likes
Me, too. Now I have to import them into another program---stupid.