Lightroom Classic: Support for HEIC file format (Windows)

  • 137
  • Idea
  • Updated 3 months ago
  • Planned
  • (Edited)
Support for HEIC file format was included in Lightroom CC but still is needed in Lightroom Classic.  When will it be added?

[HEIC support was added to LR CC 1.4 and LR Classic 7.4 for Macos 10.13 (High Sierra).  For Windows, Adobe's help article says, "Adobe is working on providing the support."

- John Ellis]
Photo of Robert MacWilliam

Robert MacWilliam

  • 5 Posts
  • 3 Reply Likes
  • Frustrated. Why create file format support in LR CC on launch but not update LR Classic at the same time.

Posted 1 year ago

  • 137
Photo of Dmitry

Dmitry

  • 158 Posts
  • 52 Reply Likes
Please add HEIC support to Lightroom CC Classic!!! Can't use Lightroom to edit pictures from iPhone X!!!
(Edited)
Photo of ProDesignTools

ProDesignTools

  • 23 Posts
  • 9 Reply Likes
Per the New York Times,  May 29th, 2018:

"Microsoft is working on HEIC support for Windows 10, and its Windows 10 April 2018 Update now prompts you to visit its app store to download codec software that will open HEIC files."

Then from Microsoft's site linked within:

"The High Efficiency Image File Format (HEIF) has arrived for Windows 10 and the Photos app! ... We have heard your feedback that these features and the ability to share photos easily with other platforms is important to you. This release we are delivering essential viewing support (You cannot edit HEIF images in this release)."

So with underlying operating system support now being added for editing, this means we can likely expect full Lightroom application support on follow thereafter, hopefully later this year.
(Edited)
Photo of Jay Stallard

Jay Stallard

  • 28 Posts
  • 8 Reply Likes
I have a big issue with Adobe controlling these forums and that is they delete posts - so I created this: https://www.facebook.com/groups/255453151688912/ I hope you will support Adobe Adopting the HEIC format
Photo of John R. Ellis

John R. Ellis, Champion

  • 3896 Posts
  • 1035 Reply Likes
Jay, I deleted the 14 duplicate posts you made to this topic in 3 minutes, leaving the original post intact:
https://feedback.photoshop.com/photoshop_family/topics/support-for-heic-file-format-was-included-in-...

Everyone who has replied to or followed this topic sees every post.   
Photo of Jay Stallard

Jay Stallard

  • 28 Posts
  • 8 Reply Likes
John, thank you - the threads are confusing ... I don't think I made 13 in 3 minutes but maybe that is when they appeared.  My frustration has been that Adobe has in the past removed information.  That said it could be a volume issue.  Regardless, it was not my intention to spam but to deal with the issue that Adobe seems to have, i.e.,  they believe only 30 people wish Lighroom to support HEIC.  I don't think that is accurate.  Also, I can't find the place to "vote" on this issue via the link they send...trying to find that for 15 minutes...gave up
Photo of John R. Ellis

John R. Ellis, Champion

  • 3896 Posts
  • 1035 Reply Likes
To add your vote to this "idea" (feature request), click Vote in the upper-right corner of this page.
Photo of Steve Sprengel

Steve Sprengel, Champion

  • 2657 Posts
  • 341 Reply Likes
Photo of Victoria Bampton - Lightroom Queen

Victoria Bampton - Lightroom Queen, Champion

  • 4517 Posts
  • 1703 Reply Likes
> My frustration has been that Adobe has in the past removed information.

The only posts that get deleted are duplicates, pirating, outright spam and bad language. Adobe doesn't even delete posts that are anti-Adobe, as can be see by many of the angry posts still live here on the forum. We do merge threads of the same issue, but the "other" versions of the threads remain live with a link to the merged thread.
Photo of Jay Stallard

Jay Stallard

  • 28 Posts
  • 8 Reply Likes
Victoria, thank you for that clarification - I did not understand what was happening and that makes sense.
Photo of Bob Cutillo

Bob Cutillo

  • 1 Post
  • 0 Reply Likes
I am on Lightroom 6.14 / Camera raw 10.1 and its about time that Lightroom supported these types. Does anyone know of a way to work on these files without the conversions?
Photo of Viktor Franzen

Viktor Franzen

  • 2 Posts
  • 7 Reply Likes
I woud really really really like Lightroom CC Classic to support the HEIF/HEIC format. Any updates?
Photo of Jay Stallard

Jay Stallard

  • 28 Posts
  • 8 Reply Likes
Sadly, no - it is not in their interest to use an open format like HEIC as that lowers switching costs when another product becomes available.  I created this to step out of Adobe's forums to get a real sense of how many people are bothered by their lack of HEIC support: https://www.facebook.com/groups/255453151688912/ I hope you will support Adobe Adopting the HEIC format
Photo of trondeg

trondeg

  • 2 Posts
  • 0 Reply Likes
Your comment makes no sense. HEIC support would be for import  - and possibly export.  Adding this does in no way "lower switching cost".

The main barrier for switching would be other products being able to import Lightroom libraries - pictures, organization, edits and all. Lightroom missing the ability to import a format is not relevant - if anything, it makes people consider hard if Adobe really keeps their end of the bargain after going to a subscription only model. As of now, it looks like they only take my money and have stopped supporting the product.
(Edited)
Photo of john beardsworth

john beardsworth

  • 1039 Posts
  • 238 Reply Likes
See list of new features that you've got with your subscription here.
Photo of Jay Stallard

Jay Stallard

  • 28 Posts
  • 8 Reply Likes
WOW! who knew! for a company with $9B in retained earnings, $2.3B in cash.  It is nice to see that they just crank out feature after feature - https://www.nasdaq.com/symbol/adbe/financials?query=balance-sheet
Photo of john beardsworth

john beardsworth

  • 1039 Posts
  • 238 Reply Likes
I've commented before about the juvenile quality of many of these posts demanding HEIC..... It's misleading to claim Adobe have not kept their side of the subscription deal by their not rushing to support this new file format. It'll come in its own good time but as stated before, it's obvious that there are complications - licensing may be one. In the meantime you have high quality alternatives. Adobe's financial performance indicates many things - quite possibly including customer satisfaction. But you can't please all the people all the time - nor should you.
(Edited)
Photo of Jay Stallard

Jay Stallard

  • 28 Posts
  • 8 Reply Likes
Your statement is based upon quite a few of assumptions.  If it has been implemented by the following companies, and Adobe focus is on images and the manipulation of images they should be at the forefront.  You suggestions of their behavior seems counterintuitive.  Lastly, their strong cash position might suggest many things, such as the one you listed above, or they are planning on going to the moon.  However, 1.5 hours waiting to talk to someone on the phone does not equate to a focus on customer service - I finally gave up - only effecting 1 metric: Time to Answer.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/High_Efficiency_Image_File_Format
In June 2017, Apple announced support for HEIF in macOS High Sierra and iOS 11 which were released in September 2017.[14][15][16]

Nokia supports the format and has released an open source JavaScript HEIF decoder on GitHub that works in a web browser.[17]

In December 2017, Zoner released an update to its Zoner Photo Studio X program, which is the first Windows application to offer support for HEIF.[18][19][19]

In March 2018, Android P and Microsoft Windows 10 (version 1803 preview, build 17123[20]) introduced support for HEIF.[21]

In April 2018, struktur AG released the open source library "libheif" that supports reading and writing HEIF files, including alpha and depth images, tiled images, thumbnails, sequences, transformations, overlays and EXIF metadata.

In April 2018, ImageMagick added support for reading and writing HEIF files.

In May 2018, GIMP added support for loading and exporting HEIF files.[22]

Photo of john beardsworth

john beardsworth

  • 1039 Posts
  • 238 Reply Likes
And your statement is based on stringing together a selective bunch of links. When did you last see a Nokia, and are Adobe quaking in their boots because of GIMP or open source libraries? You might have been more convincing if you had added Luminar which  did recently add support, but does another direct competitor like CaptureOne support HEIC/F etc? I don't think so. In this thread Adobe have said they are working on support, so fine, let's see it when it's ready and not before.
Photo of Gary Rowe

Gary Rowe

  • 91 Posts
  • 33 Reply Likes
John, you are avoiding the issue; who cares about other companies who DON'T  support it - that's whataboutery.
The important information is that there are now several companies that DO support it, so the excuses from Adobe are starting to sound hollow.
Or are you saying that it's OK for Adobe to be really late with something, so long as another competitor is even later? That is NOT what we pay for. Every month.
Photo of john beardsworth

john beardsworth

  • 1039 Posts
  • 238 Reply Likes
So, Gary, was I the first to mention other companies? Er, no. But if someone else is going to indulge in whatboutery and reference Nasdaq, they may as well have examples that are a bit more relevant than a bunch of open source stuff and a once-leading phone maker.
We pay Adobe for more than our own pet must-have feature, and ultimately you're lucky (or have limited needs) if you ever get all your must-haves from any software. It sounds like HEIC is going to come, and that's fine by me. I just expect Adobe to support new file formats only when they are ready to do so, and it's obvious that there are complications with this one. I certainly don't expect Adobe to jump every time Apple farts.
(Edited)
Photo of Jay Stallard

Jay Stallard

  • 28 Posts
  • 8 Reply Likes
So think about the barriers to voting for the feature:1) you have to be a lightroom user
2) you have to be using the latest version of IOS
3) You have to be someone that, in addition to other formats like RAW (camera specific), you also take photos with your phone/ipad
4) You have to understand your issue and root cause
5) You may try to call - I was on hold for 1.5 hours for this problem and finally gave up
6) You have to know 1 - 5 above, and search for HEIC in google
7) You have to sign up for this group
8) now you get to vote ... significant time lost for something that is important as many photos are being taken by iOS devices

My gut is there are many people, well above 102 that have this issue and if you can strip many of those layers away - it can make "voting" for this change much easier.  Thus I created this: https://www.facebook.com/groups/255453151688912/  to knock down those barriers ... lets see ...took 30 minutes - no doubt people who call will have a great deal of free time....
Photo of john beardsworth

john beardsworth

  • 1039 Posts
  • 238 Reply Likes
Hey, what about using FB to organize a mass die-in on Adobe's front lawn or at the NYSE?

Sorry to be flippant, Jay, but numbers of votes are now pretty irrelevant - and I grant you that they are no longer as trivial as when I made the comment about 30 odd in 6 months. Adobe have said here that HEIC support is coming, so it'll be available when it's ready, and in the meantime you have high quality alternatives to using this compressed format.
Photo of Jay Stallard

Jay Stallard

  • 28 Posts
  • 8 Reply Likes
I see your point John, it is valid for some folks but I use non destructive editing for a purpose - the JPEG is not a solution, but merely a workaround.  Non destructive editing is the core reason I use and pay for lightroom.
Photo of john beardsworth

john beardsworth

  • 1039 Posts
  • 238 Reply Likes
HEIC is still a lossy format, isn't it, and LR edits to JPEGs are non-destructive. Shooting DNG with the LR Mobile camera offers you a lossless option. You may find that you get more out of your money by experimenting with it.
Photo of Jay Stallard

Jay Stallard

  • 28 Posts
  • 8 Reply Likes
That may be true.  However: 
High Efficiency Image File Format (HEIF, often pronounced heef)[1][2][3][4] is a file formatfor individual images and image sequences. It was developed by the Moving Picture Experts Group (MPEG) and is defined by MPEG-H Part 12 (ISO/IEC 23008-12). The MPEG group claims that twice as much information can be stored in HEIF image as a JPEG one of the same size, even in better quality.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/High_Efficiency_Image_File_Format
Photo of john beardsworth

john beardsworth

  • 1039 Posts
  • 238 Reply Likes
Sure, it is supposed to save file size relative to JPEG. It's still lossy, and if non-destructive editing is the "core" reason, shooting lossless DNG is the logical choice.
Photo of Gary Kohls

Gary Kohls

  • 3 Posts
  • 2 Reply Likes
Suggestions to capture in DNG are classic redirection.  There are reasons to capture and use HEIF.  I have hundreds or thousands of these files on my wife's iPhone that I'd like to move off and into LR.  I want to preserve the live video (which she loves in some of her pics) as an integral part of the image.  I don't want to manage them a separate objects and tag them separately (at least not by default).  HEIF files are a fact and LR Classic needs to get off the pot and support them well.
Photo of John R. Ellis

John R. Ellis, Champion

  • 3676 Posts
  • 961 Reply Likes
Gary, are you on Windows?  HEIC is now supported on Mac.
Photo of David Converse

David Converse

  • 475 Posts
  • 140 Reply Likes
They don't even have support for non-flattened PSD files (without Maximize Compatibility) after all these years. I'm not holding my breath.
Photo of Greg Kuhnen

Greg Kuhnen

  • 16 Posts
  • 35 Reply Likes
The difference is - HEIC is the native format on the most popular "camera" in the world. Lightroom's traditional strength has been simple to moderate editing workflows.

I shoot with both a "big" camera and my iPhone and want to mix photos in the same workflow. I can't do that without an ugly and lossy conversion through JPEG today.
Photo of Johan Elzenga

Johan Elzenga, Champion

  • 1599 Posts
  • 647 Reply Likes
On most iPhones you can use DNG nowadays. Maybe not with the Apple camera app, but there are plenty apps (including Lightroom Mobile) that support this.
Photo of Dmitry

Dmitry

  • 158 Posts
  • 52 Reply Likes
You can't shoot DNG to avoid the problem. Lightroom shoots DNG very poorly. They all are too smeared from hand movements in compare to the standard Camera app.
(Edited)
Photo of Johan Elzenga

Johan Elzenga, Champion

  • 1599 Posts
  • 647 Reply Likes
So use another app that can shoot in DNG. There are plenty of them.
Photo of Johan Elzenga

Johan Elzenga, Champion

  • 1599 Posts
  • 647 Reply Likes
BTW, the Lightroom camera app has a 'Professional' setting that allows you to manually adjust things like ISO and shutter speed, so you can avoid hand movement problems.
Photo of Dmitry

Dmitry

  • 158 Posts
  • 52 Reply Likes
You are not right. The standard Camera can eliminate movement problems with THE SAME settings. Just check it. I think Apple uses artificial intelligence and hidden API for that.
(Edited)
Photo of Yury

Yury

  • 1 Post
  • 6 Reply Likes
It is just another way Adobe is trying to push us toward the cloud crap. The fact that HEIC support has been added in the LR CC but not in Classic is a clear indication. 
Photo of Victoria Bampton - Lightroom Queen

Victoria Bampton - Lightroom Queen, Champion

  • 4261 Posts
  • 1544 Reply Likes
Er, no, they just hit some bugs that couldn't be fixed in time for release deadlines. It doesn't mean it won't come, but this is brand new tech.
Photo of Greg Kuhnen

Greg Kuhnen

  • 16 Posts
  • 35 Reply Likes
I suspect a lot of us are watching the next few "Classic" releases very closely. It's quickly going to become clear whether Adobe has effectively abandoned that app.
Photo of TheBatman

TheBatman

  • 38 Posts
  • 45 Reply Likes

It's a small thing, but this encapsulates for me why Adobe's cloud subscription model is such a disappointment. The original promise of moving to the cloud model was so they could add features as they are ready, instead of having to wait for a big "version" release to launch them. Yet that hasn't happened at all ... and in fact the pace of innovation has clearly slowed down massively over the last few years. 

Now, you may argue that the new LR CC is precisely what I'm describing - an auto-updated version that is continually tweaked, just like a web browser - but the fact is that it's not suitable for most of us who have a ton of images in local storage. So effectively Adobe is telling their serious/long-time users to take a hike, all the while putting engineering resources into a copycat of Apple Photos and Google Photos, which nobody will use because if they want that, they are already using Apple Photos or Google Photos.

Sigh. At least can we get HEIC/HEIF support? It already exists in Adobe code, for goodness sake. Ridiculous.

   
Photo of Victoria Bampton - Lightroom Queen

Victoria Bampton - Lightroom Queen, Champion

  • 4261 Posts
  • 1544 Reply Likes
> The original promise of moving to the cloud model was so they could add features as they are ready

New features are added as soon as they're ready. We don't have to wait 18-24 months anymore. Now releases run about every 2 months. This new feature just isn't ready yet.

Don't worry that LRCC is taking resources away from Classic. It's a separate team - just like adding new features to Photoshop doesn't take away from Lightroom's development.
(Edited)
Photo of Jay Stallard

Jay Stallard

  • 28 Posts
  • 8 Reply Likes
In year 2000 we called cloud co-location.  Nothing new here except that web based applications have massive limitations.  They are clunky, slow, and really don't work well offline.
Photo of Greg Kuhnen

Greg Kuhnen

  • 16 Posts
  • 35 Reply Likes
While we're at it - let's get specific about how HEIC should be supported. The current CC implementation preemptively converts files to jpeg (an unnecessary, lossy conversion) and loses any portrait mode depth maps in the process. That's completely counter to the idea of a non-destructive editing workflow.

I'd like to see HEIC treated like other formats - always use the native file or some lossless conversion of it as the foundation and apply processing on top of that.
Photo of Franck Payen

Franck Payen

  • 75 Posts
  • 6 Reply Likes
Sounds smart, but mostly as opened in Photoshop, where we could import a depth layer and use it for later postprocessing I guess.
Photo of Greg Kuhnen

Greg Kuhnen

  • 16 Posts
  • 35 Reply Likes
One example of how this is useful - when I shoot in "Portrait" mode, the blur effect often has problems. Apple's photos app (and potentially others) can turn the depth effect off and salvage the photo. In time, there might even be more interesting things we can do in post.
(Edited)
Photo of Robert MacWilliam

Robert MacWilliam

  • 5 Posts
  • 3 Reply Likes
Greg, Thanks for taking my basic request (have LR Classic read HEIC like LR CC does) and point out how it really should be implemented. We can only hope that the delay in adding it to LR Classic is due to the time that it takes Adobe how to figure out how to open a HEIC file in a non destructive way and let us work with it.
Photo of Jay Stallard

Jay Stallard

  • 28 Posts
  • 8 Reply Likes
It is not in Adobe's interest to use an open format like HEIC as that lowers switching costs when another product becomes available.  I created this to step out of Adobe's forums to get a real sense of how many people are bothered by their lack of HEIC support: https://www.facebook.com/groups/255453151688912/ I hope you will support Adobe Adopting the HEIC format
Photo of Jay Stallard

Jay Stallard

  • 28 Posts
  • 8 Reply Likes
Yes! you are dead on - the whole point of Aperture and Lightroom was to have master files that edits were just an instruction set operate from the master image.  
Photo of Steve Quinlan

Steve Quinlan

  • 3 Posts
  • 12 Reply Likes
Does anyone at Adobe yet have an update to this issue? How is it possible that the default image format of the most used camera in the world is not supported by Adobe's flagship photo cataloging application? 
Photo of Jay Stallard

Jay Stallard

  • 28 Posts
  • 7 Reply Likes

That is May 30 of this year!
Photo of TheBatman

TheBatman

  • 38 Posts
  • 45 Reply Likes
Don't worry Steve, now that LR is "cloud" software it can be continually updated! Oh wait, except they have the code for this but it's still not updated. Never mind...
Photo of Michael Grant

Michael Grant

  • 3 Posts
  • 14 Reply Likes
+1 on this. It's insulting to add support to L-CC and not Classic CC. And a BIG +1 to @gregkuhnen comment about how to support it natively.
Photo of TheBatman

TheBatman

  • 38 Posts
  • 45 Reply Likes
I have looked over the documentation for today's 7.2 update but don't see any reference to HEIC/HEIF support. I can't believe it would have been left out... somebody please tell me I'm wrong.
Photo of Michael Grant

Michael Grant

  • 3 Posts
  • 14 Reply Likes
The fact this didn't make it into 7.2 is VERY disappointing Adobe. Just hard to reconcile 8 months since the iOS 11 beta where this first became the clear direction for iOS photo & video formats. Adobe dropping ball.
Photo of john beardsworth

john beardsworth

  • 1113 Posts
  • 259 Reply Likes
30 votes.... Maybe it will become a widespread image format among LR's target userbase, but should one expect Adobe to rush to adopt every feature that Apple add to iOS? Where it makes sense, they do - eg they take advantage of the ability to shoot DNG .
Photo of Corentin Cras-Méneur

Corentin Cras-Méneur

  • 3 Posts
  • 5 Reply Likes
Well... Yes.
I would expect them to adopt as soon as possible the new image formats being adopted on widely popular mobile phones.
The fact that they did in Lightroom CC a little while ago speaks to the fact that they do believe it’s important to them too. It just looks like they’re investing most of their efforts in the development of Lightroom CC while Lightroom Classic CC is becoming more and more of a second class citizen. I think it’s a dangerous strategy since Lightroom CC doesn’t fit everybody’s needs and some customers like myself might end up migrating to the competition (I’m looking into it, because I’m becoming more and more worried about the future of Lightroom Classic CC).
New lenses and camera bodies are added to the app on a regular basis, why not image formats? It’s not a technologically outrageously complicated thing to do and the number of apps that already support the new format illustrates this too.
Photo of john beardsworth

john beardsworth

  • 1113 Posts
  • 259 Reply Likes
30 votes - the phones might be widely adopted, but aren't LR users preferring higher quality formats? We'll  be able to tell what future Adobe plan for Classic based on more important things than their rushing to support a single image format. Fix the bugs, then support it.
Photo of Michael Grant

Michael Grant

  • 3 Posts
  • 14 Reply Likes
The comment about 'preferring higher quality formats' is missing the mark. The core issue is that MANY photographers shoot photos with their iPhone AND their traditional cameras. I just got back from New Zealand where I shot many photos with my iPhone X and my Sony A7R3. For storage optimization reasons, the new HEIF/C formats are fantastic. Lightroom Classic CC is my main photo DAM and all those iPhone photos are just black squares. As pointed out already, Adobe isn't 'evaluating' these formats as they ALREADY SUPPORT THEM IN L-CC AND PHOTOSHOP. They just haven't released support for LC-CC. Adobe pushed us Classic users into subscriptions by promising fast and timely updates 'now that you are on a subscription plan.' But dragging their heels on the default photo format for the what has become world's biggest camera installed base is just plain insulting.
Photo of TheBatman

TheBatman

  • 38 Posts
  • 45 Reply Likes
@john (1) That's not the point, it's not a special/new feature or functionality. LR continually adds supports for new cameras (D850, A7R3, and on and on) and yet this camera, which is the most used in the world, is not having support added for its file type. That's crazy. (2) If you think LR users don't care about having their iphone pictures supported/in the same catalog, I'm guessing you also worked for a camera company in 2010-2011 and argued that mobile photography will never kill point and shoots. <shakes head>
(Edited)
Photo of Dmitry

Dmitry

  • 157 Posts
  • 52 Reply Likes
They just don't care about the needs of users. It has been always like this. They even don't have bug report system - only this place where users can to weep with each other about issues that they experience.
Photo of john beardsworth

john beardsworth

  • 1113 Posts
  • 259 Reply Likes
As Victoria explained before me, they hit bugs supporting this format. At least, unlike psb, you can get the files catalogued. But when you think how many iPhones are out there, only 30 votes indicates it's not a huge priority for customers.
Photo of David Converse

David Converse

  • 469 Posts
  • 138 Reply Likes
Most customers don't know this site exists.
Photo of Corentin Cras-Méneur

Corentin Cras-Méneur

  • 3 Posts
  • 5 Reply Likes
@John. Victoria’s post was from a  month ago. The disappointment (at least for me) comes from today’s release that’s still not addressing the issue. And since the 7.2 update just came out today, it’s a bit premature to say that 30 votes (within a few hours of the release of the update) is not significant IMVVVHO.
Photo of john beardsworth

john beardsworth

  • 1113 Posts
  • 259 Reply Likes
A month is not long, and we don't know the details of the bug. It was 30 votes before today's announcement, no more since.
Photo of Corentin Cras-Méneur

Corentin Cras-Méneur

  • 3 Posts
  • 5 Reply Likes
@John. I voted just a couple of ours ago myself after searching for info on the matter, and the counter was at 25.
Photo of Dmitry

Dmitry

  • 157 Posts
  • 52 Reply Likes
Usually, only 1/1000th user reports the issue. But because Adobe is so disrespectful to users that they don't have bug reporter, I think, only 1/100,000th user reports the issues to Adobe here. 30 votes means 3,000,000 users have the same problem. At least.
(Edited)
Photo of Victoria Bampton - Lightroom Queen

Victoria Bampton - Lightroom Queen, Champion

  • 4486 Posts
  • 1679 Reply Likes
> Adobe is so disrespectful to users that they don't have bug reporter

Dmitry, have you considered it a slightly different way? Most bug report forms are a black hole. You never know whether anyone else has the same problem, let alone whether there's a workaround. But Adobe have been willing to make their bug reports completely public, and let us discuss them and vote on them. 

Whatever the numbers, whether it's 1/1000 or 1/100,000 users who report a bug, seeing the numbers in relation to other bug reports still helps prioritize (after all, only 1/1000 or 1/100,000 would have reported the other issues requests too).
Photo of Dmitry

Dmitry

  • 157 Posts
  • 52 Reply Likes
1. You don't provide official responses here. So, that's not better than conventional bug reporter.
2. Prioritizing is not enough. You must fix all popular issues - not only the top of them. Especially, when we are speaking about SUBSCRIPTION. Users purchase working software during some period of time - not only on the moment of purchase. They pay you money, you spend them but don't give working product to users. That sounds even like a scam.
Photo of Dmitry

Dmitry

  • 157 Posts
  • 52 Reply Likes
The list of solved problems shows that you fixed not popular issues but omitted popular like this. There is no logic in that.
Photo of Dmitry

Dmitry

  • 157 Posts
  • 52 Reply Likes
Another sample of EXTREMELY ANNOYING issue that was just ignored here: https://feedback.photoshop.com/photoshop_family/topics/look-on-the-crop-straighten-tool-doesnt-remai...
Photo of Jeffrey Tranberry

Jeffrey Tranberry, Sr. Product Manager, Digital Imaging

  • 14581 Posts
  • 1927 Reply Likes
That prior link is sorted by most recent. Here's sorted by me toos: https://feedback.photoshop.com/photoshop_family/categories/photoshop_family_photoshop_lightroom?topi...
Photo of Dmitry

Dmitry

  • 157 Posts
  • 52 Reply Likes
I can see only 23 more popular issues there from 995. That's 2%. So, why are you ignoring this issue?

Also I can see that you fixed only 995 issues during last 7 years. That's 142 issues per year. Or 1 issue every 2 days. How many developers do you have? It looks like not more than one. And how many money do we pay you? What are you doing with them? Just hire at least 100 more developers to help this one poor soul who is doing all the job!
(Edited)
Photo of Victoria Bampton - Lightroom Queen

Victoria Bampton - Lightroom Queen, Champion

  • 4486 Posts
  • 1679 Reply Likes
There's a really good team of engineers Dmitry. You can see their names in the About screen. Throwing more engineers at the problem doesn't really help, because it's really complex code and someone has to explain it all to new developers. You should see the list of other issues they fix, in addition to the ones reported by users... it's a really long list every release. Everything just gets prioritized. We can all wish for "more fixes" but the more fixes they put in each release, the higher the risk of creating new bugs. It's catch 22.
(Edited)
Photo of Gary Rowe

Gary Rowe

  • 98 Posts
  • 35 Reply Likes
john beardsworth - you act as though every LR user looks in this site. Personally, I expect most hardly even know it's here. And of those that do, there are those who came here to only see people reporting problem after problem, and mos likely thought it probably serves no actual purpose except to be a place for people let off steam. If Adobe were to actually use the number of votes here to prioritise their development, that would be crazy.

I just wish they would stop messing us around and get a stable platform in place, and then give us the functionality we've been asking for for ages along with supporting the new cameras/formats as they come out.

Sadly, from a lot of the issues I've been experiencing with v7 it looks as though they've resorted to trying to cut out repeating bits of processing by trying to remember what they have already displayed/processed (and so not have to redisplay it), but sometimes losing track of what's what and ending up with wrong/old data still onscreen. If true, then that'd be a real sign of desperation.
Sadly, they may be suffering from massive technical debt, and I just hope that LR 7 isn't already on its last legs.
Photo of Gary Rowe

Gary Rowe

  • 98 Posts
  • 35 Reply Likes
Victoria, yes it takes time to train as team ... but LR has been around for a long time!!!
Photo of TheBatman

TheBatman

  • 38 Posts
  • 45 Reply Likes

At the end of the day, it didn't ship in 7.2. Hence, we can all agree it was not prioritized. Now, people can differ on whether that lack of prioritization was reasonable or bat-sh*t crazy. I know which side I fall on and have no doubt I'm right. Others may feel differently. The fact remains that the iphone has (100? 1000? 1M?) times as many users as the latest Nikon/Canon/etc camera, yet those new raw formats get supported quickly and HEIF/HEIC has not. Those who don't like it can vote with their wallets, which is what I'm very close to doing.

Photo of Victoria Bampton - Lightroom Queen

Victoria Bampton - Lightroom Queen, Champion

  • 4486 Posts
  • 1679 Reply Likes
> If Adobe were to actually use the number of votes here to prioritise their development, that would be crazy

Actual votes numbers would be useless, no question, but the percentage of votes on each feature is surprisingly representative of the general feedback. Of course, they don't JUST use this forum. They talk to real people, they talk to influencers who are constantly talking to real people, and they do other research, in addition to the votes here.

Yes, there's technical debt to pay back, but believe it or not, I don't think LR7 is on its last legs. The engineers are more fired up and enthusiastic than I've seen in years. And I've been watching closely for years.
(Edited)
Photo of Dmitry

Dmitry

  • 157 Posts
  • 52 Reply Likes
I'm the only one person that reported the issue that Photoshop CC sometimes but OFTEN prevents mac from going into the sleep mode. I saw the issue on different macs - so, I'm 100% sure that EVERY mac user has the same problem. But you won't fix it, right? Because there are not many upvoters there. And you have courage to ignore issues even with such many upvoters like here.

Link to the bug report: https://feedback.photoshop.com/photoshop_family/topics/bug-report-photoshop-cc-prevents-mac-from-sle...
(Edited)
Photo of Dmitry

Dmitry

  • 157 Posts
  • 52 Reply Likes
Also I can't resist to mention that it took 1 year for Adobe to fix one single little white pixel on the corner of the screen. Do you see how diligently they work? Several people even returned their macs and displays thinking that they purchased defective hardware (me too). But that was just a software pixel from Adobe application. And that was so hard for them to fix!
Photo of Mark Knight

Mark Knight

  • 3 Posts
  • 4 Reply Likes
I'm unbelievably disappointed that Adobe has deferred this again. The best camera is the one that's always with me. The best photography workflow solution is the one that works with the camera I always have with me. Lightroom now fails. Adobe needs to consider the modern approach to cloud software with "insider" previews and the monthly subscription is now becoming a farce.
Photo of Peter Gillespie

Peter Gillespie

  • 1 Post
  • 2 Reply Likes
I won't move my photos into he cloud.  If Adobe abandons CC classic I'll have to find anther product - shame!
Photo of TheBatman

TheBatman

  • 38 Posts
  • 45 Reply Likes
255 days since the WWDC announcement of HEIF. I'll probably use this thread as a running count of how long it's been.
Photo of Dmitry

Dmitry

  • 158 Posts
  • 52 Reply Likes
Maybe they will think better about what issues to fix if all 32 people here cancel their subscription.
Photo of Mark Knight

Mark Knight

  • 3 Posts
  • 4 Reply Likes
It's a sign of the love and passion for the product that users are bothering to engage on this topic, but I agree that most users probably aren't aware of this site. It's not as if there's anything in Lightroom to encourage users to provide feedback.
Photo of john beardsworth

john beardsworth

  • 1122 Posts
  • 265 Reply Likes
Those users aware of this site haven't voted in huge numbers though, and on other Lightroom help forums you really don't see questions caused by HEIC not being supported. No doubt it will come, when the bugs are sorted out. Until then, shoot DNG - it's probably what most LR /iPhone users are doing and is better in most ways.
Photo of Dmitry

Dmitry

  • 158 Posts
  • 52 Reply Likes
DNG format from Lightroom for iPhone is extremely poor! JPG and HEIC from native Camera app produce 1,000 times better quality images. They are sharp even on long exposure. DNG isn't sharp at all on the same settings.
Photo of Dmitry

Dmitry

  • 158 Posts
  • 52 Reply Likes
By they way, somebody should post it as the separate issue to Adobe.
Photo of john beardsworth

john beardsworth

  • 1122 Posts
  • 265 Reply Likes
Even so, it looks like Lr users are still preferring the built-in camera and DNG. Here is about the only place where anyone is asking for HEIC support - which will come when it's ready.
Photo of TheBatman

TheBatman

  • 38 Posts
  • 45 Reply Likes
John with respect, it sounds like you don't appreciate the things HEIF enables that JPG and DNG do not (eg, new bounce, loop and time lapse effects available when editing on iphone). Check it out, they are pretty cool.

And whether it gets supported or not should not be a function of this forum. As stated, this is not a feature request (e.g. like dehaze) but rather support for native file formats, which Abode (usually) does automatically. It's not as if the forum was lit up for support for the Pentax *ist D (to pick a deliberately obscure camera whose file format is supported), and yet they did it in a timely manner.
Photo of john beardsworth

john beardsworth

  • 1122 Posts
  • 265 Reply Likes
You're right, I don't appreciate those things, but maybe your comment should apply generally to Lr/iPhone users? Pentax is just another raw format, HEIC/F is a new one and who knows what bugs Adobe hit, or what they may be waiting for? My guess is that the underlying issue may be OS-level support for these formats (just like video depends on the OS), but that is only a guess - and before anyone says it, no, I'm not just pointing the finger elsewhere!
(Edited)
Photo of Dmitry

Dmitry

  • 158 Posts
  • 52 Reply Likes
What is the most disgusting is that they could not even write here: "We are working on the issue".
Photo of Mark Knight

Mark Knight

  • 3 Posts
  • 4 Reply Likes
The official status of the thread is still "Under Consideration" rather than "In Progress".
Photo of Jay Stallard

Jay Stallard

  • 28 Posts
  • 8 Reply Likes
Here This was from May 30th of this year ... 
(Edited)
Photo of Greg Kuhnen

Greg Kuhnen

  • 16 Posts
  • 35 Reply Likes
Interesting - Skylum Luminar just added native heic support. They'll be on my short list of alternatives if Adobe sends Lightroom into a tailspin.

I *want* Lightroom to get its groove back. The new Sensei auto mode and performance improvements in the last couple of releases are promising additions, it's been a long time since we've seen meaningful features added to the application now branded Classic.
Photo of TheBatman

TheBatman

  • 32 Posts
  • 42 Reply Likes
Agree 100% with this
Photo of David Kent

David Kent

  • 5 Posts
  • 7 Reply Likes
Also agreed.
I'm waiting for support so I can import / archive / edit my iPhone photos. I know I can convert them to jpg. But I'll change editors before I do that.
Photo of Gary Kohls

Gary Kohls

  • 2 Posts
  • 1 Reply Like
I am stilling on a large backlog of HEIF files on multiple phone. A David said, I won’t downgrade them to JPEG to bring them into LR. Support now exists in Windows 10 so it’s time to get support into LR Classic (a most unfortunate choice of names for a great product).
Photo of witta priester

witta priester

  • 6 Posts
  • 4 Reply Likes
Adobe -- the time has indeed come.  We need this in Lightroom Classic!
Photo of Ray Toscano

Ray Toscano

  • 12 Posts
  • 7 Reply Likes
Add me to the list of users demanding this be supported
Photo of Jay Stallard

Jay Stallard

  • 28 Posts
  • 8 Reply Likes
You can add yourself to this list - I set it up today: https://www.facebook.com/groups/255453151688912/
Photo of Nathan Johnson

Nathan Johnson

  • 4 Posts
  • 4 Reply Likes
How long has this been "UNDER CONSIDERATION"? or is that new? Big time +1 on this, It's very frustrating.
(Edited)
Photo of TheBatman

TheBatman

  • 38 Posts
  • 45 Reply Likes
256
Photo of TheBatman

TheBatman

  • 38 Posts
  • 45 Reply Likes
259
Photo of john beardsworth

john beardsworth

  • 1037 Posts
  • 237 Reply Likes
It's really immature to make these posts and won't help your case. 33, by the way.
Photo of TheBatman

TheBatman

  • 38 Posts
  • 45 Reply Likes
You got a chuckle out of me on that one, John. If this is even close to the most immature thing you have seen on the internet, I'd love to know your secret. Secondly, blatant shaming of Adobe, on the proper forum, seems to be the only way to at least try to have them pay attention. If there's a better way I'm all ears. Thirdly, feel free not to follow this thread if it bothers you.
Photo of john beardsworth

john beardsworth

  • 1037 Posts
  • 237 Reply Likes
Well, no number of juvenile posts will "shame" them, especially as it's clearly not a big deal for Lr/iPhone users. As explained a few times, they hit some kind of  bug.
Photo of Gary Rowe

Gary Rowe

  • 91 Posts
  • 33 Reply Likes
Yes, well, they've been hitting a lot of them lately ;)
Photo of Gary Rowe

Gary Rowe

  • 91 Posts
  • 33 Reply Likes
And, as numbers seem to be in for this thread, that 'as explained a few times' turns out to be ..... in fact .... once.
Photo of john beardsworth

john beardsworth

  • 1037 Posts
  • 237 Reply Likes
Ha ha. I have explained it more than once, Victoria has explained it at least once. But one number does appear to be rising faster than any other - the number of juvenile posts....
Photo of Jay Stallard

Jay Stallard

  • 28 Posts
  • 8 Reply Likes
They hit a bug?  Yea, they don't want to do it.  Here are the folks that have:

In June 2017, Apple announced support for HEIF in macOS High Sierra and iOS 11 which were released in September 2017.[14][15][16]

Nokia supports the format and has released an open source JavaScript HEIF decoder on GitHub that works in a web browser.[17]

In December 2017, Zoner released an update to its Zoner Photo Studio X program, which is the first Windows application to offer support for HEIF.[18][19][19]

In March 2018, Android P and Microsoft Windows 10 (version 1803 preview, build 17123[20]) introduced support for HEIF.[21]

In April 2018, struktur AG released the open source library "libheif" that supports reading and writing HEIF files, including alpha and depth images, tiled images, thumbnails, sequences, transformations, overlays and EXIF metadata.

In April 2018, ImageMagick added support for reading and writing HEIF files.

In May 2018, GIMP added support for loading and exporting HEIF files.[22]

 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/High_Efficiency_Image_File_Format
Photo of TheBatman

TheBatman

  • 38 Posts
  • 45 Reply Likes
263. Happy Friday everyone!

The waiting is the hardest part
Every day you get one more yard
You take it on faith, you take it to the heart
The waiting is the hardest part
Photo of Daniele Carotenuto

Daniele Carotenuto

  • 2 Posts
  • 2 Reply Likes
I find it weird, to say the least, that there's no official announcement about "we are working on it" or "we don't know if we will do it"... 
Photo of Jay Stallard

Jay Stallard

  • 18 Posts
  • 1 Reply Like
Here you go - May 30, 2018: 

Photo of David Sanger (SU2)

David Sanger (SU2)

  • 12 Posts
  • 14 Reply Likes
all my iPhone photos up to 2017 I can edit in Lightroom Classic, but none of the images once I got the iPhone 7 Plus. I don't use Lightroom CC. Come on Adobe, this standard was written in 2015 . Get with it.
Photo of TheBatman

TheBatman

  • 38 Posts
  • 45 Reply Likes
270. Happy Friday everyone!

Also near as I can tell, HEIF/HEIC support was added to LR CC in mid-October, so call it 135 days ago now. I'll add that to the count :)
Photo of David Sanger (SU2)

David Sanger (SU2)

  • 12 Posts
  • 14 Reply Likes
I don't see that. My iPhone 7plus images are shot in HEIC. If I add them to Lightroom CC they get converted to JPEG on import.
Furthermore if I instead transfer the HEIC file to my MacBook Pro, the desktop version of Lightroom CC cannot see or add them to the catalog.
This  means Adobe really doesn't yet really support the format even in Lightroom CC.
(Edited)
Photo of TheBatman

TheBatman

  • 38 Posts
  • 45 Reply Likes
Ah, so even worse than I thought. Thx.
Photo of Greg Kuhnen

Greg Kuhnen

  • 16 Posts
  • 35 Reply Likes
Yup, nothing like having an "import" perform a lossy compression without telling you.
Photo of TheBatman

TheBatman

  • 38 Posts
  • 45 Reply Likes
277. Happy Friday everyone!

I heard that the Luminar LR competitor might release in mid-May, so let's call it 2 months = 60 days. Might add that to the count, too.
Photo of Jay Stallard

Jay Stallard

  • 28 Posts
  • 8 Reply Likes
From Wikipedia: 
In June 2017, Apple announced support for HEIF in macOS High Sierra and iOS 11 which were released in September 2017.[14][15][16]

Nokia supports the format and has released an open source JavaScript HEIF decoder on GitHub that works in a web browser.[17]

In December 2017, Zoner released an update to its Zoner Photo Studio X program, which is the first Windows application to offer support for HEIF.[18][19][19]

In March 2018, Android P and Microsoft Windows 10 (version 1803 preview, build 17123[20]) introduced support for HEIF.[21]

In April 2018, struktur AG released the open source library "libheif" that supports reading and writing HEIF files, including alpha and depth images, tiled images, thumbnails, sequences, transformations, overlays and EXIF metadata.

In April 2018, ImageMagick added support for reading and writing HEIF files.

In May 2018, GIMP added support for loading and exporting HEIF files.[22]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/High_Efficiency_Image_File_Format

Photo of Greg Kuhnen

Greg Kuhnen

  • 16 Posts
  • 35 Reply Likes
Google's getting in on the act - the next major version of Android (P) will support .heif photos. This has to be on Adobe's radar.