Lightroom CC: Ability to print

  • 121
  • Idea
  • Updated 2 months ago
  • (Edited)
We really need a "convenient" way to print.  Some of us still like to create prints to hang on a wall.  While I know the printing is still available in "classic", to be able to move forward with Adode, an integrated print function needs to be added to Lightroom CC.
Photo of Robert Rissmiller

Robert Rissmiller

  • 2 Posts
  • 0 Reply Likes

Posted 2 years ago

  • 121
Photo of JIm Broadwater

JIm Broadwater

  • 3 Posts
  • 2 Reply Likes
Unbelievable. An image-editing program, from ADOBE, for cryin' out loud, and no PRINT functionality? Please add soon... my subscription expires in November, and won't be renewed for a program lacking such a fundamental feature as PRINTING. 
Photo of Matthew Owens

Matthew Owens

  • 1 Post
  • 3 Reply Likes
Printing is a pretty big miss for me because the alternative of saving a JPEG and printing it with an OS-level utility not only adds multiple steps, and JPEGs to clean up after the fact, but, also because I switch back and forth between Windows and Mac.  So it requires different workflows depending on which computer I'm working from.  Part of the appeal of CC is having a unified workflow across multiple workstations.
Photo of Kim Sosson

Kim Sosson

  • 2 Posts
  • 5 Reply Likes
... Still waiting Adobe. 
I really need that softproofing & printing function. 
If there's no change anywhere near soon, I'll opt out of my plan and switch back to Lightroom Classic CC...
Photo of Olivenoire

Olivenoire

  • 161 Posts
  • 67 Reply Likes
very frustrating. 11 months later, we do not have the functionality. And we don't even know if it will be implemented.
Or maybe in a revision 2.0 of CC?
If somebody knows, please share, because you care
Photo of Mitch Wieczorek

Mitch Wieczorek

  • 20 Posts
  • 13 Reply Likes

Please add the PRINT function to LR CC
Photo of Mitch Wieczorek

Mitch Wieczorek

  • 20 Posts
  • 13 Reply Likes

While you're at it please EXPAND the export or SHARE function
Photo of Lois Reed

Lois Reed

  • 13 Posts
  • 1 Reply Like
Why Why why why why WTF! No Print function. I am reading these threads, and as per usual, no response from ADOBE!!!!!! WE PAY YOU MORE THAN EVER BEFORE!! LISTEN TO US!
Photo of Olivenoire

Olivenoire

  • 161 Posts
  • 67 Reply Likes
12 months. 12 months long for a feature how should be implemented in early alpha rev.

Sooooo strange
Photo of Antoine Delnoij

Antoine Delnoij

  • 1 Post
  • 2 Reply Likes
This reply was created from a merged topic originally titled Printing in Lightroom CC.

When will a printing module be added to Lightroom CC?
Photo of Tim Neville

Tim Neville

  • 1 Post
  • 2 Reply Likes
just started using Lightroom CC and find it unbelievable that there is no print function available.  For goodness sake Adobe, sort this out now!
Photo of Olivenoire

Olivenoire

  • 161 Posts
  • 67 Reply Likes
Right. Strangely I was not implemented initially but more crasy nothing was done after 1 year.
Photo of Jonathan Slack

Jonathan Slack

  • 14 Posts
  • 8 Reply Likes
Another plea - Lightroom CC is great - but printing is a must!
Why no Word from Adobe?
Photo of Susan Trkula

Susan Trkula

  • 1 Post
  • 3 Reply Likes
because, apparently, I'm an idiot:  I migrated and upgraded to LRCC.  And now I cannot print an image.  I know that maybe most people are only interested in online images, but I NEED TO PRINT - it's why I photograph!

WTF ADOBE - I give you $$$ every month and now I get nothing but edit and STORAGE!  I don't want a workaround!  I want a PRINT FEATURE - Abobe has definitely gone backwards.  GRRRRR
Photo of Glenn Lawrence

Glenn Lawrence

  • 1 Post
  • 1 Reply Like
Affinity photo working on a DAM

Photoshop CC coming to iOS (surely a print feature will come with)

For me it’s a matter of which comes first as I solely work in iOS and LR is the only logical DAM. AP may change that, I would migrate instantly if they beat Adobe to the punch because all their products are first class... but with PS CC coming out I would drop Aff Photo and go with a seamless integration workflow in adobe.

Which ever comes first really.
Photo of David Harbinson

David Harbinson

  • 1 Post
  • 1 Reply Like
just adding more comments ref how after all this time no print function in CC ! 
Looked at this over 12 months ago and still the same problem ! Moving back to classic
Photo of Radu-Adrian Popescu

Radu-Adrian Popescu

  • 5 Posts
  • 2 Reply Likes
Does anyone know how to get a lossless compression file out of LR CC, that also contains my edits?
It's for the purpose of printing, of course, that I wish to send the highest resolution file to a pro printing service, but I can get only jpegs and DNGs + settings, which I am really not sure how they're going to be processed. Thanks!
Photo of Victoria Bampton - Lightroom Queen

Victoria Bampton - Lightroom Queen, Champion

  • 4697 Posts
  • 1799 Reply Likes
Go for JPEG. Unless you resave it over and over again, you won't see a difference.
Photo of Radu-Adrian Popescu

Radu-Adrian Popescu

  • 5 Posts
  • 2 Reply Likes
Thanks Victoria. I wonder why is the ability to export lossless images not available? Is there a feature request I can up-vote?
Photo of Victoria Bampton - Lightroom Queen

Victoria Bampton - Lightroom Queen, Champion

  • 4697 Posts
  • 1799 Reply Likes
Here's the best feature request to vote on: Lightroom CC: Additional options needed when exporting
Photo of Jonathan Slack

Jonathan Slack

  • 14 Posts
  • 8 Reply Likes
It isn't just lossless images which is difficult, sometimes one needs to export to a particular size or quality. It seems really sad that Lightroom CC should be hampered by a very few real 'gotchas' (I really like the book module in Classic for instance).

What I don't understand is why Adobe is silent about this - IMHO they should either:

1. Say that they aren't going to put a print / export module in because it's designed that way and explain their logic

2. Say that they are going to put these features in (even if it's not imminent). 

best

Photo of Sam Fuller

Sam Fuller

  • 6 Posts
  • 5 Reply Likes
Not until I received my Canon Pro-100 printer did I even realize that Lightroom CC doesn't have a print module!  I thought certainly I'm overlooking it - nope.  I'm at a loss for words and beyond frustrated, having recently gone "all in" with Lightroom CC.  

What are you all using as a work-around?  I'm on a Mac and a total newb to printing.  
Photo of Sam Fuller

Sam Fuller

  • 6 Posts
  • 5 Reply Likes
Thanks Jonathan.  Unfortunately I just have a solo Lightroom CC subscription and don't have access to Classic or Photoshop.  Not interested in buying-up just to gain a printing feature that should be included in CC in the first place.  Ugh.  Guess I need to be looking at 3rd party software but have no idea where to go.  Perhaps my Canon driver disk has some bloat software I could use...
Photo of Jonathan Slack

Jonathan Slack

  • 8 Posts
  • 5 Reply Likes
Hi Sam
Could you 'save to' a full sized jpg file and then print that in Preview (which does quite a good job of printing). 
Photo of Jonathan Slack

Jonathan Slack

  • 8 Posts
  • 5 Reply Likes
. . . . also worth considering upgrading to the 'photographer's subscription' it isn't very expensive and sometimes it's nice to have photoshop . . and then there is the book model in Classic!
Photo of Sam Fuller

Sam Fuller

  • 6 Posts
  • 5 Reply Likes
Only problem with "Preview" is the inability to input DPI specs and/or ICC profiles (am I missing something?).  Looks like I'll be checking out the Photography Plan for another $10/month or some 3rd party print utility.  
Photo of Jonathan Slack

Jonathan Slack

  • 8 Posts
  • 5 Reply Likes
I can see that - might be worth checking out whether they have any deals right now? When I checked out adding 1Tb cloud storage I got the whole lot for £12 per month (CC,Classic,Photoshop,1Tb storage) not such a bad deal I reckon
Photo of Henrik Helmers

Henrik Helmers

  • 10 Posts
  • 5 Reply Likes
After getting to know it I very much like the print functionality in Lightroom Classic. I get just the margins and photo size I want. The sharpening and contrast settings are nice to let me tweak a single print. It is also not overly complex.

When this finally comes to Lightroom CC, I hope you keep and improve on the good bits.

Being able to print with the same level of control from the iOS app would be incredible. Not sure what is possible, but something like that would be a game changer. :)
Photo of Lois Reed

Lois Reed

  • 13 Posts
  • 1 Reply Like
I went back to lightroom classic as well - keywords stick too
Photo of Gurujeet Khalsa

Gurujeet Khalsa

  • 3 Posts
  • 1 Reply Like
I liked printing in LR Classic also. I don’t really want LR CC. I’d happily buy Classic and just pay an upgrade fee for new versions the way it used to be. My choice now is to double my monthly subscription so I can print, or go to open source solutions such as Rawtherapee to edit my Raw files connected to GIMP for printing.
(Edited)
Photo of Brian Greig

Brian Greig

  • 3 Posts
  • 3 Reply Likes
Please add printing to Lightroom CC.  You have convinced me that Lightroom CC is the way to go for my editing and storage needs, yet it lacks the basic function of producing a picture on paper. I need to be able to tweak the image just before printing and as I print if changes are needed, and I need to be in the editing program (Lightroom CC) to do so.  It appears from this string that this request has been made repeatedly for 2 years with no response from Adobe.  Not very responsive to customers. 

Photo of Victoria Bampton - Lightroom Queen

Victoria Bampton - Lightroom Queen, Champion

  • 4697 Posts
  • 1799 Reply Likes
>  It appears from this string that this request has been made repeatedly for 2 years with no response from Adobe. 

The forum can make the dates look a little wonky. LR CC was only released October a year ago. But it's a popular request.
Photo of Mitch Wieczorek

Mitch Wieczorek

  • 19 Posts
  • 13 Reply Likes
Victoria- Can you identify any other Photo software that does NOT have a print function? Really your support of Adobe on this issue is rather weak.
Photo of Gurujeet Khalsa

Gurujeet Khalsa

  • 3 Posts
  • 1 Reply Like
Add me to the list of 'dummies' who just assumed there was a Print function available in Lightroom CC when upgrading. Incredible that this is not there and silence from Adobe. Very very disappointed!
Photo of Jordan Nash

Jordan Nash

  • 15 Posts
  • 1 Reply Like
I need the ability to print batches of photos over a local network to my Canon Pro-100 from Lightroom CC for Desktop and Lightroom CC Mobile. 

At a minimum, I will need to be able to make layout templates and select paper profiles within Lightroom CC.
(Edited)
Photo of Olivenoire

Olivenoire

  • 161 Posts
  • 67 Reply Likes
So strange nothing happens. 

Is a print function is so hard to implement?
is it implemented in iOS version probably with embedded functionality of IOS. Why not in Mac OS ?

Will this be implemented or not?

Why no statement from an official?
Photo of JIm Broadwater

JIm Broadwater

  • 3 Posts
  • 2 Reply Likes
With February, 2019 comes another update, and still no print functionality in Lightroom CC. Does anyone from Adobe read these forums? Is there EVER a plan to implement a print dialog from within the app, or are we all wasting our time leaving comments here? 
Photo of Victoria Bampton - Lightroom Queen

Victoria Bampton - Lightroom Queen, Champion

  • 4704 Posts
  • 1802 Reply Likes
Yes, as you note, you can share to printers on mobile. That's the operating system doing that.

>  It seem pretty obvious that CC is not meant for the PC 

The desktop versions are much younger, whereas the mobile apps have been available for years. Desktop also has some features that mobile doesn't have yet, and vice versa. The long term aim is feature parity, but we're a way off from that yet.
Photo of Olivenoire

Olivenoire

  • 153 Posts
  • 62 Reply Likes
I can’t believe at all it is not possible to use the layer and or an api apple offer to print something.
No sorry i can’t believe it.
It is possible to print with every computer since probably the first computer exists and now with this kind of software it takes year to develop something to print?
Seriously?
And for example speak about iOS capability. Apple offer iCloud sync capabilities. Why not use iCloud sync capabilities to sync watermark setting. Why?
Why do I need to parameters on my Mac., on my iPhone, on my iPad separately? Why?
Because as simple it is, it is not on top priority of adobe developers.
Just crasy but it is as it. Adobe knows better than we what we need.
For example Adobe decide it is not possible to find a photo with its name. Why ? Is it so hard to use offline search or string text search? It is simple but adobe décided again we do not need this feature. Such a basic feature. Resulting no possibility to search a photo when offline.
(Edited)
Photo of Olivenoire

Olivenoire

  • 153 Posts
  • 62 Reply Likes
As a result I’ve decided to add more data to 4 g connexion ;)
Photo of Victoria Bampton - Lightroom Queen

Victoria Bampton - Lightroom Queen, Champion

  • 4704 Posts
  • 1802 Reply Likes
If everything was running through a single company's operating systems (e.g. Apple macOS/iOS), then yes, that would be a lot simpler. But Adobe doesn't just live in an Apple world. What happens on the macOS desktop needs to work on Windows version too, so it's not as simple as using the built-in API's.

> Because as simple it is, it is not on top priority of adobe developers. 

And yes, prioritization is the crux of the matter. Like everything in life, there are limited resources, and they're trying to balance the needs of a wide range of customers. Of course that doesn't make it any less frustrating when that's the missing feature is the one you need.
Photo of Olivenoire

Olivenoire

  • 153 Posts
  • 62 Reply Likes
You're right, Adobe does not live in apple centric system. But because Adobe offer a centric cloud solution (20Gb, 100Gb or 1Tb) available across Mac, iPhone, Windows, Adroid and Web, why not use a tiny string to synchronise through adobe's cloud (instead of iCloud) for this kind of data. (I don't know if windows and android manage watermarks in fact)
Anyway for a cloud centric solution the way Adobe offer with CC, everything this way should be possible or at least on top priorities.

But once again, I'm okay with you, ressources are not unlimited. Nevelseles,  as a simple customer, we sometimes just asking if those ressources are efficiently used or to stay positive, we are wondering about what's in the pipe. Thats the big question in fact.

But finally and it is the more important, we are hopping those limitation are not just a case study of segmentation (marketing) to catch some news customers (with CC) and not allow existing customer (from classic)  to switch from classic to CC.