Photoshop: Adjustable grid size for the warp tool

  • 33
  • Idea
  • Updated 1 month ago
  • (Edited)
Photo of brice hemmer

brice hemmer

  • 2 Posts
  • 0 Reply Likes

Posted 5 years ago

  • 33
Photo of Peter Werner

Peter Werner

  • 12 Posts
  • 4 Reply Likes
Agreed, I'd love to be able to choose the number of subdivisions in the Warp command, that would make that tool much more useful and versatile. I think even Illustrator can do it.
Photo of Tommy Szewczuk

Tommy Szewczuk

  • 6 Posts
  • 2 Reply Likes
i want to choose how many subdivisions the grid in the warp tool has and then be able to move whole horizontal/vertical lines to transform

kinda like in mari.

This reply was created from a merged topic originally titled
Photoshop: moveable subdivisions within warp tool.
Photo of edward.caruso

edward.caruso

  • 121 Posts
  • 24 Reply Likes
and i'd like to be able to brush in areas to freeze - or add grid warping to liquify - even better.
Photo of Linda King

Linda King

  • 8 Posts
  • 0 Reply Likes
I'm in. I often wish there was just one more set of grids added to the Warp Tool to make it more flexible.
Photo of C D

C D

  • 1 Post
  • 0 Reply Likes
There is a work around this. Just select a smaller area in you image and work in steps instead. The selection you've made will still only have the warp tool's 9 areas but by selecting only a small area of your image you can pretty much place the grid/points where you want them and warp the image step by step. Not optimal but it works.
Photo of edward.caruso

edward.caruso

  • 121 Posts
  • 24 Reply Likes
what I think is needed is for an option in Liquify to use a Bezier curves (like paths) adjustment. So we can can transform objects and areas a bit more smoothly than the push/pull of Liquify. And you'll be able to go back and forth between these 2 methods. then by doing this in the Liquify dialogue you have access to freeze and thaw brushes so selective areas can be protected at will. and in the end you can save a mesh and load it onto something else like a layer mask. By adding transform to Liquify and giving a more dense transform grid the user would have a really powerful image transformation tool.

Maybe I should make this a new topic and flesh it out more.
Photo of edward.caruso

edward.caruso

  • 121 Posts
  • 24 Reply Likes
anyone tried or heard of this plugin?
I desperately need a better warp solution than what CS6 offers and found this:
HSC edit/Grids
http://www.humansoftware.biz/pages120...

Doesn't look that polished but it seems to offer warping with a denser grid. I contacted them about a trial, waiting to hear back.

it even says you can turn your grid into Bezier curves which is what I'm looking for.

Photo of edward.caruso

edward.caruso

  • 121 Posts
  • 24 Reply Likes
now that PS is a rolling updated subscription product - I want to ask - any update or timeline on finally improving the warp tool in free transform? By adding many more intersection lines (that the user can specify) or even better to have really precise control with bezier curves. I've repeatedly requested adding the bezier curves functionality to the liquify plug-in. That would be really helpful for real world tasks.
(please don't suggest puppet warp - it doesn't really work)
Photo of christoph pfaffenbichler

christoph pfaffenbichler, Champion

  • 939 Posts
  • 77 Reply Likes
Well, I certainly would appreciate improvements for Warp, but the statement
»puppet warp - it doesn't really work«
does seem incorrect.
Puppet Warp does work, not as you would like it to it seems, but nonetheless ...
Photo of ASMC GmbH

ASMC GmbH

  • 3 Posts
  • 2 Reply Likes
Puppet warp and liquify are no alternative to the warp tool.
Because the warp tool works with curves, you can easily create a page curl effect and use it on smart objects as well.
Puppet warp however uses polygons and behaves completely different, especially when you drag edges to the wrong direction. And liquify works on a pixel basis and softens and smears the picture.

Adding an option to add more points to the warp grid would be easy to do. I personally don't understand why nobody thought of this or implemented this years ago and we still have to stick with workarounds.
Photo of christoph pfaffenbichler

christoph pfaffenbichler, Champion

  • 939 Posts
  • 77 Reply Likes
»Adding an option to add more points to the warp grid would be easy to do.«
And you base that statement on what?

»I personally don't understand why nobody thought of this or implemented this years ago and we still have to stick with workarounds.«
People have thought of this (as this thread seems to proof).
Why it has not been implemented only people who have worked for Adobe could say for sure, I guess, but they may not be at liberty to.
Photo of edward.caruso

edward.caruso

  • 121 Posts
  • 24 Reply Likes
yes it is very frustrating why the warp tool hasn't been improved - especially since we are paying for rolling updates now. Christoph - I'm curious about your resistance to this topic? Maybe you have no need for this type of feature improvement for others it could be something used everyday on every image. As we have discussed - PW and Liquify are not able to manipulate images in the same way as Warp. Warp has very little controls available to it compared to PW and liquify. More control points, bezier controls and save/load mesh.
Photo of christoph pfaffenbichler

christoph pfaffenbichler, Champion

  • 939 Posts
  • 77 Reply Likes
»Christoph - I'm curious about your resistance to this topic?«
It’s not just contrariness on my side, though there may be some of that, too.
Also I can be something of a fusspot, I guess, so wrong or uninformed statements can irk me.

I don’t deny that the Warp functionality could stand improvements (along the lines of Illustrator’s envelope Distort) but I have the feeling that sometimes some people misjudge their insight into the issue.

Yes, many feature requests and this one in particular would be beneficial, but sometimes
• the number of beneficiaries is small and
• the necessary resources to realize a feature are considerable
In my opinion I and most of the other users posting here very likely are in no position to accurately judge how well necessary effort and potential pay-off for this feature would correspond.
Photo of Kelvinj Bown

Kelvinj Bown

  • 2 Posts
  • 0 Reply Likes
I think if you make photoshop as good as possible the payoff may not be immediately felt but it will have payoff in the long term. Adobe make so much money. they shoud do whatever it takes to make the software as good as possible. Sometimes see creating the tool itself as an art, and as in art the rewards can come in terms of appreciation of  the overall name of the artist and attention that it brings. TO say we cant develop this because it doesnt immediately reward the investment is seeing photosip solely as a business. If there is no real care for those using it, i feel that is very, very sad. If you look at the ancient acheivements of the world - creating the great monuments, churches, for example, the cost and return was a very small part of the creator's inspiration. Be a little deeper, please. 
Photo of edward.caruso

edward.caruso

  • 121 Posts
  • 24 Reply Likes
"Also I can be something of a fusspot, I guess, so wrong or uninformed statements can irk me. "
What is uninformed about any of the requests on this topic? That PW is insignificant in dealing with the types of issues outlined here? PW has its uses (from what I've heard - but not in my images) but cannot correct volume anamorphosis which the requested improvements to the warp tool could help fix.

As a long time PS user I know it takes forever for some features to come out but I'm not impressed when most recent additions are Behance, ipad, type and 3D stuff.
Photo of christoph pfaffenbichler

christoph pfaffenbichler, Champion

  • 900 Posts
  • 69 Reply Likes
»What is uninformed about any of the requests on this topic?«
To make it clear: I am not opposed to the feature being requested and would consider it an improvement, too, but:

The statement
»please don't suggest puppet warp - it doesn't really work«
is in my opinion not wholly technically correct or at least in need of further qualification.
Admittedly one could argue that the context is provided in the lines leading up to it and me focusing on the one sentence is nitpicking ...

The statement
»Adding an option to add more points to the warp grid would be easy to do.«
makes me wonder how the poster can judge the programming effort such a feature would necessitate.
Are they programmers? Have they worked on applications of a complexity similar to Photoshop’s?
Photo of Haim Azoulay

Haim Azoulay

  • 5 Posts
  • 2 Reply Likes
its about time that some adobe staff will respond this thread and take this initiation to production ASAP!
Photo of edward.caruso

edward.caruso

  • 121 Posts
  • 24 Reply Likes
Yes I would love to hear any feedback from the PS team about this - if it is even being considered.
The current implementation of warp is very limited. As an architectural photographer - its something I have to deal with all of the time.
Photo of Jaroslav Bereza

Jaroslav Bereza

  • 275 Posts
  • 25 Reply Likes
Photo of Dave Jennings

Dave Jennings

  • 35 Posts
  • 2 Reply Likes
This reply was created from a merged topic originally titled Photoshop: Increase the number of handles/control points and improve precision in....

Warp (> Edit > Transform > Warp) from what I can find out seems to only support a standard 3 x 3 grid with a fixed quantity of control points/ handles. I'd like to suggest the ability to add further points/ handles & a customisable quantity of grid squares or even presets of say 4x4, 5x5 etc to improve accuracy under certain conditions. Puppet Warp isnt available on a Smart object after using the "Edit > Transform> Distort command first", otherwise that might have been an option.
Photo of Jaroslav Bereza

Jaroslav Bereza

  • 275 Posts
  • 25 Reply Likes
Photo of paul davies

paul davies

  • 4 Posts
  • 0 Reply Likes
This reply was created from a merged topic originally titled Photoshop: Transform - warp tool - more control please..

Hey there, something i would really love to have an update on is the free transform tool on the warp optrion. It splits it up into a grid which you can push and pull to get a great result most times. But what would be great is if you could have the option to move individual points in tandem - ie. the object is split into a grid of 9 boxes, 2 vertical lines and 2 horizontal; if you could grab all the points on one of the vertical axis and drag them up at the same time or drag them sideways at the same time.
The other thing is there is no option to drag just one point on an exact vertical or horizontal like any other tool where you hold shift down to drag in a straight line. If these things were made possible, it would really save me alot of time.
Would anyone else find these changes useful?
Photo of Zab Abbey

Zab Abbey

  • 1 Post
  • 0 Reply Likes
Yes, I want to change the number of divisions of the grid please. To be honest, I'm a bit shocked that you can't.
Photo of Wolfgang Kreische

Wolfgang Kreische

  • 2 Posts
  • 3 Reply Likes
Yes, YES, YES i wish this also.
Please make this. Thanks
Wolfgang
Photo of Stefan Klein

Stefan Klein

  • 59 Posts
  • 33 Reply Likes
Yes, please more grids! And let us choose different interpolations algorithms! Warp does not respect Photoshop`s interpolation presets nor does it have an option in the options bar.
Photo of edward.caruso

edward.caruso

  • 121 Posts
  • 24 Reply Likes
Adobe - its been a few years since this request has been brought up - any feedback from you?
Photo of Tobias Steiner

Tobias Steiner

  • 1 Post
  • 0 Reply Likes
Just hit the same road block on a project that others have been describing here for years.  Please add this feature!  It would make fast work of UV mapping work for us 3D artists that use PSD texture files.
Photo of herbert wegen

herbert wegen

  • 36 Posts
  • 20 Reply Likes
Photoline has had a really nice non-destructive warp (it is called distort in PL) for years, which allows for any number of  columns and rows. Even includes a lighting effect.

Multiple distortions and warps can even be stacked, if required.