Lightroom: Ability to use relative paths to images

  • 4
  • Idea
  • Updated 3 years ago
  • (Edited)
Update Lightroom so it can use relative paths if a disk is renamed or if a library is moved.

Software which restricts basic Finder usage is painful in every workflow. Apple were forced to update the way events work in Finalcut X and even InDesign will automaticlly find missing links if the path to just one link is updated - quick and easy.

I'm trying to rename a drive which contains my library but have had to change it back as "Update folder location" doesn't work at the root level. After a good hour, I'm still sifting through search results to find an answer - this all seems unnecessarily painful right?

Cheers
Photo of Ben Sciascia

Ben Sciascia

  • 4 Posts
  • 0 Reply Likes

Posted 4 years ago

  • 4
Photo of Steve Sprengel

Steve Sprengel, Champion

  • 2611 Posts
  • 333 Reply Likes
Do you mean you have many photo-folders or even individual photos directly at the root level?

I always have my photo-folders down at least one folder from the root of a drive, and then the Update Folder Location corrects the situation by only changing the highest common parent folder's path.
Photo of Ben Sciascia

Ben Sciascia

  • 4 Posts
  • 0 Reply Likes
Thanks for the reply - this is solved thank you.

The images are organised inside date directories, and when I tried updating them I was having to do it for each directory - but I noticed that many directories/photos were missing?

But since changing the name back, Lightroom now sees all the directories - so I changed the name again and used "Update Folder" on the library folder and it worked.

Cheers
Photo of Steve Sprengel

Steve Sprengel, Champion

  • 2611 Posts
  • 333 Reply Likes
It is optimal to Update-Location for the highest/closest-to-the-root folders, first, otherwise if you do one lower down, that will block the higher-up Update from working completely, I think. It isn't clear from your description why things didn't work for you, originally.

The issue with making things relative is that each top-level folder could be from a different device, and so there is nothing to be relative to. Obviously lower-level folders are relative to the higher-up ones, so in effect LR does have relative paths, already, if you choose to update the highest one, first.
Photo of Nack Athens

Nack Athens

  • 1 Post
  • 0 Reply Likes
I am on the go and work at a couple of different places with different environments (PCs/Macs). I use external hard drive to store all photos and catalogs. Unfortunately, I have to pick the top folder and drill through to the last browsed folder in "Library" every time I plug-in to a different system.
Photo of Ian Cervantez

Ian Cervantez

  • 1 Post
  • 0 Reply Likes
I still think this is a good idea. I sync my Lightroom directory over to cloud services (like Dropbox, Google Drive, etc.) and because those are held within my home folder the application breaks when I open Lightroom on a different computer (since that computer's home path for my user account is different). If Lightroom were storing relative paths, then syncing in this manner would work successfully.

My photo library is larger than the mere 20GB that creative cloud allows me - so syncing the Lightroom directory is my next best solution for cloud backup.