LIGHTROOM: Collection Sets and Collections - an easier and better way

  • 2
  • Idea
  • Updated 4 years ago
  • (Edited)
Does anyone besides me feel the whole idea of "Collections" vs "Collection Sets" is overcomplicated? Why not just allow a Collection to contain:

(a) Photos and
(b) other Collections?

That would make life so much easier than the current awkward scheme!
Photo of rbdigital

rbdigital

  • 1 Post
  • 0 Reply Likes
  • confident

Posted 4 years ago

  • 2
Photo of Victoria Bampton - Lightroom Queen

Victoria Bampton - Lightroom Queen, Champion

  • 3822 Posts
  • 1266 Reply Likes
It did, once upon a time. LR3 and earlier, if I remember rightly. I can't remember the reasons it changed though, sorry.
Photo of Rob Cole

Rob Cole

  • 4831 Posts
  • 372 Reply Likes
|> "It did, once upon a time..."

Are you sure about that?

|> "Lr3 and earlier?"

Lr1 maybe? ;-}

~R.
Photo of john beardsworth

john beardsworth

  • 961 Posts
  • 199 Reply Likes
Pretty sure it changed when smart collections were introduced, Victoria. That would make it LR2.
Photo of Victoria Bampton - Lightroom Queen

Victoria Bampton - Lightroom Queen, Champion

  • 3822 Posts
  • 1266 Reply Likes
You're quite right, I've just been back and checked. That is a long time ago!!!