32bit support needs extending

  • 5
  • Idea
  • Updated 2 weeks ago
33bit support really needs to be extended to support some pretty basic things. Its lagging far behind. Things that need adding.

Curves adjustments
Overlay blending modes
Invert, both as adjustment layer and the ability to just invert an layer.

After effects has a lot of these things already.
Photo of Peter Aylward

Peter Aylward

  • 19 Posts
  • 4 Reply Likes

Posted 2 weeks ago

  • 5
Photo of Ronald Chambers

Ronald Chambers

  • 56 Posts
  • 6 Reply Likes
I'd settle for 32 bit upgrades of all tools missing like histogram, Curves, .......   Almost 10 +/-  years since 32 bit per channel was announced.

RONC
Photo of David Converse

David Converse

  • 555 Posts
  • 168 Reply Likes
Ok I'm gonna disagree. Most users don't need 32 bit support and I don't want Adobe wasting development resources on that when they have a lot of other things to fix beforehand.
Photo of David Converse

David Converse

  • 555 Posts
  • 168 Reply Likes
All developers have to allocate resources because they can't fix everything. We know they are working on a new compositing engine and maybe it will add more 32-bit support. My point is that this request is for niche functionality and there are bigger fish to fry.
Photo of matthew stevens

matthew stevens

  • 5 Posts
  • 1 Reply Like
And you are entitled to your opinion. And in your opinion is it niche fair enough. But that's just an opinion right?
Photo of Richard Thompson

Richard Thompson

  • 6 Posts
  • 3 Reply Likes
David, you're dead wrong and it's shocking that you think settling for functionality where you get (literally) less than 1/60,000th the amount of color value...is acceptable. There is a sizable working group of professional PS users relying on the 30-bit display functionality, working in its limited 32 bit capabilities, and really trying to maximize what kind of image quality PS is capable of. If that's beyond your image processing needs fair enough, but let's not pretend that working with massive increases in image quality and usability are some niche feature request... 
Photo of Paul Kelsall

Paul Kelsall

  • 2 Posts
  • 4 Reply Likes
I don't understand why I'm able to do stuff with 32bit in AE and then not repeat that in PS... Makes no sense.

Don't get me wrong, PS is a great tool, but so much of the architecture is old. Hopefully the acquisition of Allegorithmic will invigorate the devs to support this. 32bit is not new guys, HDR is here to stay. Not supporting it now would be the same as saying 'we're not supporting layers' 20 years ago because it's a 'niche' requirement. If you're shooting brackets, you're already halfway towards 32bit workflow. Why settle for an 8bit tone map of all that raw camera data???
Photo of David Converse

David Converse

  • 555 Posts
  • 168 Reply Likes
:shrug: Everyone wants their pet feature. I, personally, am voting against Adobe putting resources into 32-bit features. You can disagree.
Photo of matthew stevens

matthew stevens

  • 5 Posts
  • 1 Reply Like
oh i have another 32bit request.... propper support for multilayer exrs
Photo of Paul Kelsall

Paul Kelsall

  • 2 Posts
  • 4 Reply Likes
This is a massive one if you're going from animation to print. 
Photo of Richard Thompson

Richard Thompson

  • 6 Posts
  • 3 Reply Likes
also in with 32-bit support requests for content aware fill, adjustment layers, and the functions used to stitch panoramas etc. this is a sorely needed update! I must routinely resort to 3-4 other software titles outside the Adobe family to do really basic things related to created HDRI Domes (32-bit spherical imagery) for CGI purposes.