94 Messages
•
5.2K Points
Tue, Apr 5, 2011 5:18 PM
11
Photoshop: Blur/Sharpen Adjustment Layers
Just like you can add a brightness filter on top of a layer, you should be able to create an effect filter which acts on the objects under it. Blur / sharpen would be particularly useful.
Ideas
•
Updated
5 months ago
671
12
11
Helpful Widget
How can we improve?
Tags
effect filters
Responses
JeffreyTranberry
Adobe Administrator
•
15.8K Messages
•
295.1K Points
10 years ago
The Secret Life of Smart Filters
Sr. Product Manager, Adobe Digital Imaging
0
chris_cox_2148894
15.1K Messages
•
195.8K Points
10 years ago
Adjustment layers only work well because they don't have a support region (area) to adjust -- they can work on a single pixel at a time.
0
edwardsanchez
94 Messages
•
5.2K Points
10 years ago
This reply was created from a merged topic originally titled
Smart effects without smart objects.
4
0
edwardsanchez
94 Messages
•
5.2K Points
10 years ago
1
0
heikobrantsch
7 Messages
•
128 Points
9 years ago
Now what would be really cool to see in a future version of Photoshop:
The ability to apply Smart Filters (e.g. blur) as Adjustment Layers kind of like in AE!
This would be way more handy than having to handle multiple Smart Objects.
This reply was created from a merged topic originally titled
Photoshop: Filters as Adjustment Layers.
0
0
heikobrantsch
7 Messages
•
128 Points
9 years ago
Well, I see you're saying that it's not possible because performance would break down if filters were to be applied as adjustment layers.
But then again think of how well After Effects can handle the very same task. Even with more than one effect on each adjustment layer. I did read the article from the first comment, but please remember CS1 was released almost 9 years ago... I think the cicrcumstances are different nowadays!
I know that you people at Adobe can do it! Smart Objects are good. But in many cases not really what I want. Projects can get uncomfortably complex. I'd really love to see this happening. And I think there are many out there who think the same way.
3
0
heikobrantsch
7 Messages
•
128 Points
8 years ago
What if behind the GUI surface, Photoshop would be creating a smart object from all the layers below the new adjustment layer, but we can still see the separate layers of the smart object within the same project underneath the adjustment layer. So technically it would still be the same as it is today, but from a user perspective it would seem to work the same way as in AE. I think that would be a useful improvement to the workflow and yet you would get rid of the problems that come with "real" adjustment layers for filters.
1
0
sharraj_d
1 Message
•
60 Points
5 years ago
Then apply blur to it. Now you can adjust / remove the applied blur @ what ever point of time unless you merge the layer.
0
0
laser_legroup
5 Messages
•
142 Points
2 years ago
The Blur effect on adjustment layers will be very usefull for standard and uncommon projects.
I'm working on a project and I have to emulate a special print process on fabrics before and after the wash.
I have to work on around 200 layer and have the possibility to create with adjustment layers the emulation of final product after the wash (i need to hide and show effects). I have a loot of elements in my preset for emulate the wash, but the GAUSSIAN BLUR is probably the last piece I need for create the perfect emulation.
it is not possible to do that with all the single layers or with smart objects, because I mostly require something like a folder where I put my effects for temporary influence all the layers below (like normal adjustment layers of photoshop or after effects) and I will show and hide when i need.
Could be a great idea give the possibility to add blur in adjustment layers or Add effects to folders, like the bleeding options
0
0
warren_heaton
380 Messages
•
7.2K Points
2 years ago
// Warren Heaton, ACP/UGM/AEL
0
morikubo
3 Messages
•
80 Points
9 months ago
0
0
jonas_madsen_rogne_dcxiqtd5nmpay
6 Messages
•
156 Points
9 months ago
With the GPU acceleration of today, this is doable. Even though, sure, if you add 50 of them, and you have a 30000x30000 image, then things will nautrally be slow. But many things in Photoshop gets slow at a very large sizes (like brushes) - doesn't mean they shouldn't be an option at all. :)
0