25 Messages
•
924 Points
Sun, May 15, 2011 8:43 PM
Solved
Lightroom: Synchronize Folder broken for JPGs in LR 3.4
In LR 3.4, if a folder has JPGs mixed with other files, "Synchronize Folder" incorrectly reports the JPG files as missing, and offers to "Revove missing photos from catalog."
This does NOT appear to happen if I attempt to synchronize a folder which ONLY has JPGs in it.
I'm running on Windows Vista Business 64bit.
Paul Wasserman
This does NOT appear to happen if I attempt to synchronize a folder which ONLY has JPGs in it.
I'm running on Windows Vista Business 64bit.
Paul Wasserman
Problems
•
Updated
10 years ago
1
4
Helpful Widget
How can we improve?
Tags
synchronize folder
lightroom
synchronize
Responses
beat_gossweiler
230 Messages
•
4K Points
10 years ago
- these JPEGs have Raws in the same folder going with them
- when you originally imported them, you had "Treat JPEG files next to raw files as separate photos" checked in Preferences
- you now have this option unchecked
This would explain this behaviour.
Beat
0
0
paulwasserman
25 Messages
•
924 Points
10 years ago
- the JPEGs do indeed have same-named RAW files in the folder
- the JPEGs weren't imported, they were created by Export and added to the Catalog
The option was in fact unchecked, as it likely was at the time that the JPEGs were exported. When I checked it, that solved the issue.
However, in the context of "Synchronize Folder", it makes no sense that that the images should be identified as "Missing photos" when they are physically present on disk where they are supposed to be. The flag setting shouldn't be a factor.
So, thanks for identifying the cause of that oddity, but it's still a bug that needs to be fixed.
0
0
beat_gossweiler
230 Messages
•
4K Points
10 years ago
I believe this behaviour is by design:
If you have the option unchecked, any JPEGs residing in the same folder as the Raw files with the same file name and capture time have to be treated as JPEG sidecars, and must not appear in LR as separate images. That's exactly what the synchronize ends up with if you go ahead and have the JPEGs removed from the catalog (the Raws will be marked as having a JPEG sidecar).
The end result of a "Synchronize Folder" has to be the same as if the entire folder was imported into a new catalog, and that's what is happening.
So IMHO, that's not a bug, it's a feature :-)
Beat
2
paulwasserman
25 Messages
•
924 Points
10 years ago
0
0