7 Messages
•
130 Points
Mon, Oct 26, 2020 7:29 PM
Solved
Lightroom Classic: Spot removal removing brush stroke
So I am using the brush tool on some of my photos and after that I decided to use the spot removal tool. Upon doing so it removed more than the spot. It actually ended up removing separate brush strokes I have made. I am not sure how this is possible but please look into this.
Problems
•
Updated
2 months ago
• Edited
575
30
Helpful Widget
How can we improve?
Tags
problem
bug
lightroom
Responses
i4detail
9 Messages
•
140 Points
3 months ago
https://www.dropbox.com/s/c9jf48ry9ytix6k/michelle%20adobe.zip?dl=0
Here is the image I used in the video I created here:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u1anLY2dn1A&feature=emb_logo
Along with the XML. I notice that the effect is not as pronounced/non-existent if I only apply one brush/one or two spot removals. I have to get to the fourth or fifth spot removal before it acts up. Basically, as the rendering gets more intensive, the problem gets more pronounced (but then goes away for the sixth spot removal)
Mac 10.14.6
iMac (Retina 5K, 27-inch, 2017)
4.2 GHz Intel Core i7
64 GB Ram
Radeon Pro 580 8 GB Graphics Card
Shooting Canon 6D Raw.
3
0
richard_wyvill
2 Messages
•
72 Points
3 months ago
I have the same issue. For example, if I use the dehaze brush on a whole sky and then select the spot healing tool to remove a single dust spot on the sky, random chunks of the sky unconnected to the spot that has been removed or the source sky used to heal the spot not only lose the benefit of the dehaze brush effect but actually turn almost white. Renders a photo unusable. I am using a brand new iMac with up to date Catalina installed (v10.15.7) and newest (10.0) version of Lightroom Classic.
5
0
bill_3305731
808 Messages
•
9.6K Points
3 months ago
On the other thread for this topic, I provided an example where the image, even when exported, was ruined and another when it was not correct after returning to library. . So definitely more than just a display issue.
3
0
gillevin
7 Messages
•
102 Points
3 months ago
Upgraded to LR Classic v10, and besides the terrible slowdown, the Spot Removal is acting funky:
On each spot removing click, random previous brush strokes of the Adjustment Brush are being deleted and coming back to life with more spot removing clicks, as other brush strokes are being deleted...
iMac 27 2017
4.2 GHz i7
Redeon Pro 580 8GB
Mojave 10.14.6
5
0
Oliver
2 Messages
•
70 Points
2 months ago
When I cover a section of an image with a brush tool adjustment, the coverage is even and as expected.
However, if I then use the spot removal tool, even once, the previous brush tool coverage is affected by means of becoming extremely patchy.
This is confirmed when I activate the red overlay. The once uniform and even spread of brushing, is now a mess of random patches.
I couldn't see this being reported yet on the forum.
1
0
mark_hinwood
1 Message
•
66 Points
2 months ago
Any news on an update fix for this issue?
0
0
mike8
2 Messages
•
70 Points
2 months ago
If I use the "brush adjustment" tool, then use "spot removal" tool, the brush adjustment will move. If I then move place where the spot removal tool initially selected, then the brush adjustment will move back to where I had it originally.
0
0
bill_3305731
808 Messages
•
9.6K Points
2 months ago
From a Windows 10 user.
This is the only bug I experienced with V10, doubly fixed:
These were the only bugs I was experiencing.
Performance improvements: the only occasional slowdown I was experiencing was with the Luminance Noise Reduction slider which was much faster with V10 over V9.4 and only occasionally dragged just a little. RAW Fuji X-T3 photos still experience about a 1/2 second delay. It could still be GPU limited (Quadro P2200 5GB) except that the GPU utilization doesn't go over 32%. 4.9GB of the GPU memory is consumed by the slider so the problem could be insufficient memory on the card. My guess is that V10/10.1 are trying to make more used of the card and are limited by the memory limit. I've read on GPU sites that 4K monitors need an 8GB card, for whatever that's worth.
1
0