Lightroom Classic: Crop improvements

One of the areas where Lightroom Classic has remained inadequate/under-developed has been the crop tool.   I offer the following suggestions (which unfortunately should have been incorporated years ago.)

1)  Content-aware crop for all images (not just panos).  This should have been added years ago, shortly after it was added to PS.  As LR is designed for processing many photos, telling customers we can just export to edit in PS is a weak cop-out.   There is no good excuse for not offering this in LR Classic, as it should have been there at least 2 years ago.

2) Additional/expanded custom/user preset crop ratios.  Like other presets and settings, we should be able to add more preset crop ratios and re-order them in the menu.

3) Improved Crop Aspect Controls.  For years now, the crop tool has only had 2 poor options for crop orientation.  Either click on "aspect" and then click on photo and drag and hope that you stop dragging while the crop box alternates between vertical and horizontal as the program chooses what it "thinks" you want. (That's being generous.)   For how many DECADES have we had "page setup" options where you can just click on Vertical/Horizontal (portrait/landscape) orientations, yet this basic, fast, easy-to-use tool isn't available in Lightroom's crop dialog.  We should be able to click or toggle between the two aspect, not be forced to click, drag hope we get the right orientation and then still need to adjust cropping.  It is slow and falls way short.  Your other suggestion is to unlock the crop and manually drag the sides.   Another WEAK work-around instead of just having the obvious, industry standards that have existed for decades.

4) Improved Sync features.  LR Classic needs the ability to easily sync our workspace settings via the cloud.  ALL (or selected) presets, develop settings, panel layout, watermarks, and the like should be able to be synced via the cloud.   This is even more important and obvious than raw files.   Raw files/photo files are not stored in "hidden" places or system folders, the most important thing to offer to sync is the stuff that is harder for customers to find and requires more work to sync manually.   When it comes to "sync" this was the most obvious thing to add, and the most needed... but it wasn't a priority because it doesn't use enough cloud space to be a new revenue stream by selling storage.  

Frankly, I'm disappointed that I even need to be here to post this.  These things should be totally obvious, especially to a company that thinks they are an industry leader.

These things are "no-brainers", yet these obvious things remain missing.