Bridge: Restore Export Panel In Bridge

Like others commented, we are not talking about the OUTPUT module. We are talking about the EXPORT module!!!

+1. Need EXPORT module. To easily extract jpeg's out of RAW-files. How simple is that?

C'mon Jeffrey, as a Chief Customer Advocate, won't you please do some advocating on our behalf! The EXPORT module (not OUTPUT) was essential to my workflow and served its simple purpose perfectly (specifically the Save to Hard Drive options). The current workarounds are cumbersome and tie up programs wasting valuable time. Yes, Lightroom does a good job, maybe better in some respects, but that doesn't help if you are not working on photography. What about for web designers, who need to quickly save JPEGs at various sizes? You simply can't beat the drag & drop functionality which was apparently stripped without explanation. Please revisit this issue and help bring back this critical functionality we have paid for and expect from Bridge. See further discussion of Output vs. Export module complaints here...
http://feedback.photoshop.com/photosh...?

Jeffrey is a shill for The Man

Sorry, my bad.

Jeffrey: Any chance of including the Export module? I am on a whale shark photo shoot, and it is taking me about 40% longer to process images. Lightroom does not work terribly well for me, so this is a great Photoshop/Bridge tool.

I would say it's unlikely - it was cut due to low customer use and costs to maintain - but the team does weigh feedback. Just to clarify, it's 40% slower using Image Processor?

Jeffrey: It is slower and not comfortable, and with the old Bridge you needed only one side heigth or width to make jpg with the Image Processor you need both! So You must sort the pics before... by aspect ratio

Image Process or supports running actions, so you could use the Fit Image command (or conditional actions) to handle portrait or landscape aspect ratios.

Jeffrey,
As Paul already stated, the export panel is a different module. I don't say it was a good module because it needed improvement but it was the only way to let Bridge do the work on it's own. You can write actions in PS and also use Image Processor but both needs PS to fulfill this task.

The power of the export module was that you could let run Bridge in the background while continuing working in PS on other things.

Instead of improving the export module Adobe decided to dump it. Without a proper replacement this is not the correct way to get customer satisfaction.

When people buy an upgrade they expect at least improvement of existing features or replacement of existing features with better functionality.

The Adobe Output Module was key for many users, something Adobe did clearly not understand otherwise they would have kept it in CC or listened to many users asking for improvement of the AOM. Dumping it caused a lot of trouble for many users, including problems with installing the separate download for AOM.

Synchronized windows was key for users with a 2 monitor set up, yet it also disappeared from CC. Mini Bridge was promising in CS4, screwed up in CS5 and never been developed to the key feature it could be for not only Suite users but also PS users needing access to a lot of files.

Bridge needs a lot of attention and this has not been the case since CS4, almost no improvement nor good working features added, and on top of this dumping key features users rely on without offering proper alternatives.

I can imagine the disappointment because by now I'm one of those disappointed people, despite all my FR and other ideas still nothing seems to change for Bridge.

Please surprise us with a stunning Bridge CC2!!
regards
Omke

++++

Scratching my head at the cost to maintain argument. Does it really cost a lot to maintain functionality that has already been developed and worked just fine? It was much easier to setup and use than the other solutions I have tried like Image Processor, Batch Actions, ACR's Save Image..., even Lightroom's Export. Bridge is the place where it makes the most sense to me to grab a set of files, and simply drag them to a preset, then click Go, and let the files magically process, all while you are still able to do other work. Maybe it was the Adobe staff that had low usage or understanding of this tool. For me, it worked beautifully. I would only be more upset if you took away batch renaming! Perhaps if the usage of the tool was limited, it was only because people didn't realize it was there. At least let us install it separately like the Output module (although I would prefer they both be simply included again). Thank you for your consideration!

Fuck, what does it cost to get the goddamn photos out of the app? A rather ominous oversight or general stupidity on all accounts

Still using CS6 for this. It's 5th of May 2016.

They know. Clearly they don't want to do it. When you can influence a purchasing decision at your company, keep that in mind. I do.